<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making the &#8220;Discussion Paper&#8221; Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://savevca.org/archives/322/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://savevca.org/archives/322</link>
	<description>The VCA is in Danger... help with SaveVCA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 06:04:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: savevca1</title>
		<link>http://savevca.org/archives/322/comment-page-1#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>savevca1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savevca.org/?p=322#comment-82</guid>
		<description>SEE FULL &#039;RESPONSE&#039; FROM UOM BELOW:

http://savevca.org/archives/577</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEE FULL &#8216;RESPONSE&#8217; FROM UOM BELOW:</p>
<p><a href="http://savevca.org/archives/577" rel="nofollow">http://savevca.org/archives/577</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: savevca1</title>
		<link>http://savevca.org/archives/322/comment-page-1#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>savevca1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 04:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savevca.org/?p=322#comment-81</guid>
		<description>UPDATE FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE REGARDING THE ABOVE QUESTIONS:

&quot;Yes, we have received your letter dated 5 January, 2010 and it was forwarded to Dr Ziggy Switkowski, who is currently reviewing the questions.

I expect a response is not too far away but unfortunately I do not have specific information at this stage.

I will certainly let you know if I receive any updates.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE REGARDING THE ABOVE QUESTIONS:</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes, we have received your letter dated 5 January, 2010 and it was forwarded to Dr Ziggy Switkowski, who is currently reviewing the questions.</p>
<p>I expect a response is not too far away but unfortunately I do not have specific information at this stage.</p>
<p>I will certainly let you know if I receive any updates.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://savevca.org/archives/322/comment-page-1#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savevca.org/?p=322#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Perhaps someone could find this link, but I recall there was an open letter by a previous dean of music at UoM posted on a current staff member&#039;s blog, and it was scathing about the melbourne model and what it would do to music education in Australia. That letter would be useful to have available for the current discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps someone could find this link, but I recall there was an open letter by a previous dean of music at UoM posted on a current staff member&#8217;s blog, and it was scathing about the melbourne model and what it would do to music education in Australia. That letter would be useful to have available for the current discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://savevca.org/archives/322/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 07:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://savevca.org/?p=322#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Good luck for the review. Glyn and Sharman have a history of sacking staff - for what they say are &#039;business reasons&#039;. Ziggy is a business executive who has shown more interest in profit than quality or customer service. What can you expect for the outcome of the Discussion paper, and the final decision by Glyn? This looks like an exercise to gain time and allow more staff to leave in despair or be pressured out. The good old Melbourne Model!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck for the review. Glyn and Sharman have a history of sacking staff &#8211; for what they say are &#8216;business reasons&#8217;. Ziggy is a business executive who has shown more interest in profit than quality or customer service. What can you expect for the outcome of the Discussion paper, and the final decision by Glyn? This looks like an exercise to gain time and allow more staff to leave in despair or be pressured out. The good old Melbourne Model!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

